Borussia Dortmund midfielder Jude Bellingham addressed Chelsea’s penalty problem after scoring a second during last night’s Champions League clash.
Jude Bellingham felt Chelsea ‘s new penalty in Borussia Dortmund’s defeat was a joke. After a disappointing night in the UEFA Champions League. For this young star, with the game in the round of 16 teams, the second match last night. The home team got a 1-0 lead in the first half from Raheem Sterling from Then “Sing the Blues” moved away to 2-0 early in the second half. That they got a penalty
The penalty came as Ben Chilwell crossed over to the left. Before crossing the ball into the penalty area and hitting referee Marius Wolfe’s arm. Before blowing a stop to see VAR and turning. Returning to the point as a penalty. Kai Havertz was in charge of killing. But smashed badly into the post, bounced out, Saleh Uschan cleared the bounced ball. But replays confirmed that the Dortmund midfielder went into the box before blowing a new shot. This time, Havertz made excuses and didn’t miss it.
Bellingham had watched both umpires after the UFABET game and disagreed with both of those umpires. In particular, he was baffled by the decision to award Chelsea a new penalty. “It’s a yard or two away. I’m not sure either. I don’t want trouble, I’ve paid them enough,” Bellingham told BT Sport after witnessing the handball. I think that was disappointing in itself. The fact that they had another shot. For every penalty Especially when he runs (take a penalty) that slow, there will be about a yard of people intruding into the penalty area ′′ But that’s the game I think he’s decided and we have to live with. It was a tough night for Bellingham, who missed a chance to score and showed his frustration late on when he was booked for a tough and reckless tackle on Reece James.
On the other hand, Borussia Dortmund boss Edin Tercic appears to be skeptical of Chelsea’s spending money on players. After his side were eliminated from the Champions League by a 2-0 result, it meant German outfit Dortmund suffered their first defeat of 2023 and the 40-year-old felt the feeling. that his side have performed well enough to compete with English clubs who have spent more than £600 million on players since the summer.
When asked if his plans were thrown into the air after Julian Brandt was forced to be removed from the squad after just five minutes in the second leg, Terzic told BT Sport : [We lost] three players who were in good form over the past few weeks ′′ But that’s part of the game. we adapt well We have enough quality in the team. And that’s a good thing ′ ′ If you look before the season. If you compare the two teams… But I think if you look at these two games This is what we want ′ ′ We don’t want to compete with Chelsea in the transfer market. We want to compete with them on game day. And I think we’ve done it twice.
Terzic also spoke about the problematic penalty that “I am responsible for the performance of our team,” Tercic added. “I don’t want to talk about the referee. I think it’s a decision in a tight situation ′′ I think in the first 10 minutes you can feel the power not only from Chelsea but also from the field ′′ ′′ After that we come back to the game again . But they scored. And we couldn’t do it ′′ We have a clear chance from Bellingham. And there are only 2-3 counterattacks that we have to defend. But then we didn’t create enough chances and that’s the problem.